Of several projections created before or at the Renaissance, most have fallen in disuse long ago, and only a few with some outstanding properties are remembered today. Much information about these projections is uncertain:
Projections mentioned here are of mainly historical significance; some where already presented when fitting one of the main projection groups. A strong Western bias is evident as I have little information on cartographic development in other cultures.
|
| Trapezoidal map in symmetrical variant, standard parallels 60° and 20° North and South |
|
| Equatorial orthographic map, central meridian 70°E |
The orthographic projection, one of the most realistic maps in a pictorial sense, provides an interesting contrast to the much later "globular" approaches.
Apparently, much of the rich scientific inheritance from Antiquity was forgotten or ignored during most of the Western Middle Ages; however, despite the widespread modern myth, the idea of a spherical globe was never banned on religious terms and was accepted by most learned people (Columbus argued not about a round, but, mistakenly, a small Earth).
The so-called globular maps were essentially simple pictorial devices for presenting general geographic features. Their main purpose was emphasizing the Earth's roundness; no globular projection is equal-area or conformal. Originally, all were restricted to one hemisphere bounded by a circle, with only equatorial aspects considered. Both the central meridian and Equator are straight, perpendicular lines. Basic geometrical constraints, summarized below, define all historic designs.
In spite of superficial similarity to azimuthal projections, globular maps are not developed by proper perspective rules: the graticule is arbitrarily placed using easily drawn curves. As usual in cartography, no approach is perfect: although Fournier's second work best matches the visual aspect of a three-dimensional globe, the "Nicolosi" map has possibly the least global distortion of shape; latest to be widely published, the latter was almost certainly the very first to be invented.
|
|
|
| Bacon | First Apian | Second Apian |
|
|
|
| Second Fournier | First Fournier | Nicolosi |
| Globular maps of the eastern hemisphere (central meridian 70°E) | ||
One of the oldest known arbitrary projections in a hemisphere was described by the great philosopher Roger Bacon (ca. 1265) and survived due to works by Monachus (ca. 1527) and d'Ailly. The design was modified in two proposals by Apian (1524), one of which was used by Tramezzino (1554) and extended by Agnese and Ortelius.
Fournier introduced two modifications to the globular style in 1643, the first using circular arcs instead of straight lines as parallels. A further change was popularized by Giovanni Nicolosi's projection of 1660 which, although also attributed to La Hire in 1794, was probably devised by al-Biruni, ca. 1000. Most modern mentions to "globular" maps refer to the "Nicolosi" design, widely popular even in the nineteenth century.
| Projection | Parallels | Meridians | ||
| Common name | Shape | Equidistant at | Shape | Equidistant at |
| Bacon | straight | boundary meridians | circular | every parallel |
| Apian 1 | straight | central meridian | circular | every parallel |
| Apian 2 | straight | central meridian | elliptical | every parallel |
| Fournier 1 | circular | boundary and central meridians | elliptical | Equator |
| Fournier 2 | straight | boundary meridians | elliptical | every parallel |
| Nicolosi | circular | boundary and central meridians | circular | Equator |
| General features of basic globular projections | ||||
|
| Ortelius map, approximate extension of first Apian design; central meridian 0° |
Oval maps have straight parallels and simple curves for meridians. The maps by Agnese (ca. 1540) and Ortelius (1570) are probably derived from Apian's first design, using semicircular arcs of fixed radius for the outer hemisphere. The result fits a 2:1 frame and looks like the modern projections III and IV by Eckert but it is not, of course, equal-area. Neither it is pseudocylindrical because meridian spacing is not uniform in the inner and outer hemispheres.
The second design by Apian uses elliptical meridians and, as a modern curiosity, can be extended using arcs of inverse excentricity. Despite being pseudocylindrical, passing resemblance to Mollweide's elliptical map is only superficial. |
| Second Apian map extended to whole world, central meridian 0° |
|
| "Nicolosi" projection extended to full world map, central meridian 0° |
![]() |
![]() |
| South and North hemispheres of a possible reconstruction of Leonardo da Vinci's octant map; boundary meridians start from 45°. Gores were slightly spaced in original map. | |
Resembling star projections, octant maps were briefly used contemporaneously to early oval maps. They divide the Earth surface in eight equal-shaped pieces, usually bounded by the Equator and four meridians. Each spherical triangle is separately projected into a roughly triangular octant; if its edges are circular arcs centered on the opposite vertex of an equilateral triangle, the octant's shape is called a Reuleaux triangle.
Leonardo da Vinci presented a Reuleaux triangle-based octant world map (ca. 1514) with gores arranged in separate, shamrock-like hemispheres, but omitting the graticule; the projection method can only be speculated. O. Finé published a partial graticule (1551), again without specifying details. Quite possibly, parallels are nonconcentric circular arcs equally spaced along both meridian edges and central meridian of each octant; meridians are equally spaced along the Equator.